FP7 Call 5: Difference between revisions
From Istlab
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content deleted Content added
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Neat ideas (not sure where they fit) |
Neat ideas (not sure where they fit) |
||
* Make OSS data computable in a way similar to that of WolframAlpha. (Panos) and open SQO-OSS allowing researchers to submit plugins. Use VMs and sandboxing to make this safe to execute. (dds) |
* Make OSS data computable in a way similar to that of WolframAlpha. (Panos) and open SQO-OSS allowing researchers to submit plugins. Use VMs and sandboxing to make this safe to execute. (dds) |
||
[[ Brief Description ]] |
|||
Revision as of 16:12, 25 June 2009
Publication date 30/07/2009, deadline 03/11/2009.
Material
Candidate partners
Preliminary topics
According to Zwegers' presentation and based on a discussion he had afterward with Giannis Kanellopoulos, the following issues are relevant to software quality:
- Issues with very large, dynamic, open service networks:*
- From design-time to run-time.
- Quality of open systems without fixed boundaries.
- Opportunities with open source software and service engineering.
- Ways to address these issues: Highly Innovative Service / Software Engineering*
- Service / Software engineering methods and tools.
- Verification and validation methods, tools and techniques.
- Methods, tools and approaches specifically supporting the development, deployment and evolution of open source platforms.
Neat ideas (not sure where they fit)
- Make OSS data computable in a way similar to that of WolframAlpha. (Panos) and open SQO-OSS allowing researchers to submit plugins. Use VMs and sandboxing to make this safe to execute. (dds)
Brief Description
