FP7 Call 5: Difference between revisions
From Istlab
Jump to navigationJump to search
Content deleted Content added
Add preliminary topics |
→Preliminary topics: Add two ideas |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
** Verification and validation methods, tools and techniques. |
** Verification and validation methods, tools and techniques. |
||
** Methods, tools and approaches specifically supporting the development, deployment and evolution of open source platforms. |
** Methods, tools and approaches specifically supporting the development, deployment and evolution of open source platforms. |
||
Neat ideas (not sure where they fit) |
|||
* Make OSS data computable in a way similar to that of WolframAlpha. (Panos) |
|||
* Allow researchers to submit plugins. Use VMs and sandboxing to make this safe to execute. (dds) |
|||
Revision as of 07:08, 5 June 2009
Publication date 30/07/2009, deadline 03/11/2009.
Material
Candidate partners
Preliminary topics
According to Zwegers' presentation and based on a discussion he had afterward with Giannis Kanellopoulos, the following issues are relevant to software quality:
- Issues with very large, dynamic, open service networks:*
- From design-time to run-time.
- Quality of open systems without fixed boundaries.
- Opportunities with open source software and service engineering.
- Ways to address these issues: Highly Innovative Service / Software Engineering*
- Service / Software engineering methods and tools.
- Verification and validation methods, tools and techniques.
- Methods, tools and approaches specifically supporting the development, deployment and evolution of open source platforms.
Neat ideas (not sure where they fit)
- Make OSS data computable in a way similar to that of WolframAlpha. (Panos)
- Allow researchers to submit plugins. Use VMs and sandboxing to make this safe to execute. (dds)
