FP7: Critical Infrastructure Protection: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:41, 12 October 2007

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== Project Proposals ==
-'''(i)''' Assume that attacks and breaches are unavoidable; focus on how to
+* [[RedZone]]
-make systems resilient in spite of them. For instance, extend Recovery
+* [[Mapping Critical IT Infrastructures]]
-Oriented Computing ideas to apply to the security infrastructure. What
+* [[PROMIS]]
-if instead of a company or country running services on servers, having
+* [[Reliability Evaluation of Free / Open Source / Libre Software]]
-them run on virtual machines (cf. what Amazon offers with its EC2
-service) that run on farms and can be brought up and down at will? If
-something is attacked, we just bring it down and spawn another
-pre-configured virtual machine hosting exactly the same services... In
-sort, combine virtualisation and ROC for security infrastructure.
+== Call ==
-'''(ii)''' Develop a way to map ciritical IT infrastructures.  The
-dependencies are very complex, and therefore you need tools and data
+* [[CallDetails-ICT-SEC-2007.1.7]]: Call details
-to explore what is really critical.  Is Vodafone part of Greece's
-critical infrastructure?  Linux? Solaris? MS-DOS? Postgres? So we do a
+== Partners ==
-kind of service and artefact dependency analysis, mapping dependencies
-and criticality indicators/measures not only software but telecom
+* [[ICT-SEC-2007.1.7 Partners Table]]
-links, hardware facilities, etc. We develop the software and then run
-a pilot study.