Java Runtime Libraries Comparison - Revision history

Bkarak: /* Threats of Validity */

2008-11-10T14:33:09Z

Threats of Validity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 10 November 2008
Line 29:		Line 29:

	=== Threats of Validity ===		=== Threats of Validity ===

			'''update''': The version that we will compare is '''1.5'''.

	* The three systems are not directly comparable ('''updated''': added in the paper)		* The three systems are not directly comparable ('''updated''': added in the paper)

Bkarak: /* External Characteristics */

2008-11-10T14:31:07Z

External Characteristics

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 10 November 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	=== External Characteristics ===		=== External Characteristics ===

	* Micro-benchmarking (maybe in collections etc).		* Micro-benchmarking (maybe in collections etc). ('''update''': maybe this should be a separate paper)
	* Number of Bugs ('''update''': cannot find data for [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK])		* Number of Bugs ('''update''': cannot find data for [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK])

Dds: /* General */

2008-09-09T12:43:46Z

General

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 9 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== General ==		== General ==

	'''Main Concept''': The main idea is to compare the three most complete implementation of the 1.6 Java Platform Specification JSR. The libraries will be compared in the terms of software complexity metrics (CK suite and some others).		'''Main Concept''': The main idea is to compare the three most complete implementation of the 1.6 Java Platform Specification JSR. The libraries will be compared in the terms of software complexity metrics (CK suite and some others). Possible publication venue: ICSE.

	'''Participants''': [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK], [http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/ GNU Classpath], [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony].		'''Participants''': [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK], [http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/ GNU Classpath], [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony].

Bkarak: /* External Characteristics */

2008-09-09T09:57:45Z

External Characteristics

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 9 September 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:

	* Micro-benchmarking (maybe in collections etc).		* Micro-benchmarking (maybe in collections etc).
	* Number of Bugs ('''update''': cannot find data for [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK]		* Number of Bugs ('''update''': cannot find data for [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK])

	=== Requirements Drives Quality ===		=== Requirements Drives Quality ===

Bkarak: /* Threats of Validity */

2008-09-09T09:57:30Z

Threats of Validity

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 9 September 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	=== Threats of Validity ===		=== Threats of Validity ===

	* The three systems are not directly comparable		* The three systems are not directly comparable ('''updated''': added in the paper)
	** [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK] implements 1.6 JSR,		** [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK] implements 1.6 JSR,
	** [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony] implements 1.6 JSR (beta)		** [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony] implements 1.6 JSR (beta)

Bkarak at 09:36, 9 September 2008

2008-09-09T09:36:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 9 September 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Nice and proven, the problem with that, it is done before in various contexts.		Nice and proven, the problem with that, it is done before in various contexts.

			=== Mathematical Approach (Vs Public Interface) ===

			Maybe we can find (observing our data ofc) a mathematical equation or a theorem of some sort, that will describe certain relations between the metrics.

			=== External Characteristics ===

			* Micro-benchmarking (maybe in collections etc).
			* Number of Bugs ('''update''': cannot find data for [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK]

			=== Requirements Drives Quality ===

			Examine if Requirements dictates quality or the design of code, since in our case we have a specification that guides the implementation.

			* Clustering by public class + non-public dependencies

			=== Threats of Validity ===

			* The three systems are not directly comparable
			** [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK] implements 1.6 JSR,
			** [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony] implements 1.6 JSR (beta)
			** [http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/ GNU Classpath] implements part of 1.5 so far (updated 9/9/2008)

Bkarak: New page: == General == '''Main Concept''': The main idea is to compare the three most complete implementation of the 1.6 Java Platform Specification JSR. The libraries will be compared in the term...

2008-09-09T08:26:25Z

New page: == General == '''Main Concept''': The main idea is to compare the three most complete implementation of the 1.6 Java Platform Specification JSR. The libraries will be compared in the term...

New page

== General ==

'''Main Concept''': The main idea is to compare the three most complete implementation of the 1.6 Java Platform Specification JSR. The libraries will be compared in the terms of software complexity metrics (CK suite and some others).

'''Participants''': [http://java.sun.com/ OpenJDK], [http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/ GNU Classpath], [http://harmony.apache.org/ Jakarta Harmony].

== Brainstorming ==

Various ideas that can be evolved in the process of this paper.

=== Open Source Vs Closed Source Development ===

Nice and proven, the problem with that, it is done before in various contexts.